For years now we have focused on delivering a consistent message to customers, looking for ways to co-ordinate channels and make sure that a customer receives a consistent offer, regardless of the offer. Some people have termed this 'surround sound marketing', 'omni-channel marketing', or even some other buzz words. But the principle is that a customer receives a consistent message regardless of the channel.
However, with real-time decisioning that we are able to deliver through products like uDecide®, should we be focused on consistency or should we just focus on ensuring that we are constantly relevant? The analogy that I use is a conversation. Would you rather meet someone and talk about one thing, or would you rather meet someone and talk about a range of relevant things? Does it really matter that I offer a customer a credit card 3 times and a transaction account 4 times, providing that both offers are relevant?
I have come to the conclusion that consistent relevance is much more important than a consistent message. But I would love to hear your views...
Contact us if you have any suggestions on resources you would like to see more of, or if you have something you think would benefit our members.
Get in TouchSign up to receive updates on events, training and more from the MA.